Once again, I find it more important to think outside the usual politics and focus on what will happen rather than what just happened.
The basics: Norway a far-left socialist workers’ paradise which made it the perfect target for a terrorist. The operation was well planned, meticulously thought out and perfectly executed.
- Targeting this age group, its political persuasion which makes sheep of its individuals, and the choice of environment… an island. The shooter assured himself of no armed opposition, no law enforcement, no EMS, limited communication and the luxury of time in which to carry out his plan. The shooter (dress as a cop) is shown at right apparently firing into the bodies of the dead and dying.
- He was methodical… the relatively low number of wounded (based in early reports) indicates a near-professional (given the above advantages) deadly follow though in a target-rich environment.
- He also knew that he would not be shot on sight if he didn’t engage law enforcement or military, and be able to make his statement and live out his life well-cared for in the bosom of the socialist state; over the next 30-40 years the socialists will strive to find out “why he hates us.” Doctors, shrinks and social workers will lavish him with care and concern while the victim families will be almost immediately forgotten and ignored.
So for this motivated terrorist, there is simply no personal downside… he knew the left perfectly well.
I find it difficult under such repeated incidents (Columbine, VaTech, etc.) to feel any sympathy for a political mind-set that demands total victimization from its followers who are sacrificed on the altar of socialist dogma.
Implications of the Oslo shooting for America:
Almost immediately the shooter was described “blond,” “Nordic-looking,” “tall”, “Norwegian.” Obama propagandists at MSNBC quoted a “specialist in Islamic movements” as saying:
“… widespread assumptions (are) that the attacks were connected to international terrorism could be wrong.” He concluded that suspect’s description indicates “an internal rather than an external extremist.”
Associated Press account:
(AP) — “The suspect in police custody — a blonde blue-eyed Norwegian with reported Christian fundamentalist, anti-Muslim views. He has been preliminarily charged with acts of terrorism.”
So the despicable practice of “profiling” was used to single out the suspect on the basis of his race. Why is it that profiling is perfectly fine only when it benefits ragheads?
So the narrative has been written and issued to the world news media in talking points that will be zealously employed for the next several weeks.
‘Right wing, fundamentalist, Christian, anti-Muslim”… where do we hear those epithets most often? Yes… our own far-left Marxist thugs who control the government and news media.
Never let a good crisis go to waste — motto of the Obama Regime
The Oslo shooting will be linked directly to domestic terrorist through language and repetition: A Google search of the phrase “GOP lunatic fringe” produces 364,000 hits and I just heard it used by the democrats a few days ago.
CLINTON 1995: We hear so many loud and angry voices in America today whose sole goal seems to be to try to keep some people as paranoid as possible and the rest of us all torn up and upset with each other. They spread hate. They leave the impression that — by their very words, that — violence is a acceptable. You ought to see — I’m sure you are now seeing the reports of some things that are regularly said over the airwaves in America today. It is time we all stood up and spoke against that kind of (pounding podium) reckless speech and behavior.
Yet it is Clinton who was responsible for the mass murders at Ruby Ridge and Waco by his federal agents.
Oslo is made to order for Obama and his thugs to blame us and get the spot light off his on-going attempts to destroy this country.
The ruling party of Norway and his mind-numbed robot followers would feel exactly at home in the Democrat party; they all want the same government, world government. If you care to read more about the communist-leaning government in Norway and how (like Obama) the youth are captured at an early age to be used and sacrified in one way or another read on:
Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s first steps into politics came when he was in his early teens and was influenced by his sister Camilla, who at the time was a member of the then Marxist-Leninist group Red Youth. Opposition to the Vietnam War was his triggering motivation. Following raids of heavy bombing against the North Vietnamese port city Hai Phong at the end of the Vietnam War, he participated in protest rallies targeting the United States Embassy in Oslo. He threw stones at the building and broke several windows. He escaped arrest by the police, though several of his friends were caught.
The Labour Party (Norwegian: Arbeiderpartiet, A/Ap) is a social-democratic political party in Norway. It is the senior partner in the current Norwegian government as part of the Red-Green Coalition, and its leader, Jens Stoltenberg, is the current Prime Minister of Norway.
The Norwegian Labour Party is officially committed to social-democratic ideals. Its slogan since the 1930s has been “work for everyone”, and the party seeks a strong welfare state, funded through taxes and duties. During the last 20 years, the party has included more of the principles of a social market economy in its policy, allowing for privatisation of government-held assets and services and reducing income tax progressivity, following the wave of economic liberalization in the 1980s. The Labour Party profiles itself as a progressive party that subscribes to cooperation on a national as well as international level. Its youth wing is the Workers’ Youth League.
Norwegian Labour Party (Det norske arbeiderparti) to the Labour Party (Arbeiderpartiet). The party claimed there had been confusion among voters at polling stations because of the difference between the official name, Norwegian Labour Party, and the colloquial name “Labour Party”. The name change will cause Arbeiderpartiet to appear on the ballot, thus eliminating any potential confusion.